Rules concerning income tax and gambling vary internationally.

United States[edit]

In the United States, gambling wins are taxable.

The Internal Revenue Code contains a specific provision regulating income-tax deductions of gambling losses. Under Section 165(d) of the Internal Revenue Code, losses from “wagering transactions” may be deducted to the extent of gains from gambling activities.[1] Essentially, in order to qualify for a deduction of losses from wagering, the taxpayer can only deduct up to the amount of gains he or she accrued from wagering. In Commissioner v. Groetzinger, the Supreme Court Justice Blackmun alludes to Section 165(d) which was a legislative attempt to close the door on suspected abuse of gambling loss deductions.[2]

Gambling Tax Around The World Per

Wagering Transaction[edit]

The Internal Revenue Service has ruled that a “wagering transaction” consists of three elements.[3] First, the transaction must involve a prize. Second, the element of chance must be present. Finally, the taxpayer must give some consideration.

Gambling tax around the world per

Section 165(d) and Professional Gamblers[edit]

In Bathalter v. Commissioner, a full-time horse-race gambler had gains of $91,000 and losses of $87,000.[4] The taxpayer deducted the expenses under Section 162.[5] The service argued that Section 165(d) precluded the taxpayer from engaging in gambling as a 'trade or business.'[4] The Tax Court held that the taxpayer's gambling was a business activity and allowed the deductions.[6] In essence, the court held that Section 165(d) only applies when a taxpayer is at a loss instead of a net gain and “serves to prevent the [taxpayer] from using that loss to offset other income.” [7] However, if the taxpayer has a net gain, as the horse-race gambler did, then the taxpayer may deduct the expenses under Section 162, and Section 165(d) does not apply.[8]

Section 165(d) and Recreational Gamblers[edit]

In addition, in Valenti v. Commissioner, the court reiterated that Section 165(d) applies to professional gamblers as well as recreational gamblers.[9] The court stated, '... it has been held both by this Court and various courts of appeals that wagering losses cannot be deducted, except to the extent of the taxpayer's gains from wagering activities, and it has been so held even where such activities were conducted as a trade or business as opposed to a hobby.'[10] Therefore, for example, if a recreational gambler visits a casino one Saturday and accumulates $600 of losses and $200 of gains, that recreational gambler may deduct $200 of the wagering losses (because she can only deduct an amount up to the amount of wagering gains she accrued).

United Kingdom[edit]

In the United Kingdom, wins (unless in the course of a trade) are not taxable and losses are not deductible.

Germany[edit]

Gambling Tax Around The World 2019

2020

In Germany, wins are taxable since July 2012 by 5% of the winnings (profit).

Canada[edit]

In Canada gambling income is not generally taxable. If the gambling activity can be considered as a hobby, the income is not taxable.[11][12]

By 1942, enough money was raised to rebuild Johnstown, yet the tax exists to this day, and brings in around $200 million a year for Pennsylvania. New York City places a special tax on prepared foods, so sliced bagels are taxed once as food and again as prepared food, thus creating a sliced bagel tax. The ICSS, in partnership with Sarbonne University, looked at data on tax havens, legal and illegal gambling, online betting and match fixing. The international sports-betting market is worth an.

The gambling tax rates around the world vary. As mentioned, Macau has a high tax rate of 40 percent whereas Latvia comes in second place at 25 percent and Nigeria in third place at 20 percent. Portugal only taxes lottery winnings at a rate of 35 percent while Slovenia taxes 50 percent of lottery winnings but only if they exceed €4,000. In any event, at present the Swedish government charges a massive 30% of tax on gambling winnings from casinos and sites outside the US. Some tournament can see as much as 50% tax on them, which makes it similar to the Norwegian model (i.e. Not the best place to be gambling and paying tax). In 1980, corporate tax rates around the world averaged 40.38 percent, and 46.67 percent when weighted by GDP. Since then countries have recognized the impact that high corporate tax rates have on business investment decisions so that in 2019, the average is now 24.18 percent, and 26.30 when weighted by GDP, for 176 separate tax jurisdictions.

If the gambling is carried out in businesslike behaviour, then the income is taxable and losses deductible. Making approximately $50 million in sports lottery bets and earning a profit of $5 million was not considered businesslike behaviour in Leblanc v. The Queen. However, in the case of Luprypa v. The Queen the gambling income was ruled to be taxable. The case involved a skilled pool player that profited approximately $1000 per week playing staked pool games against bar patrons.[12]

Poker differs from many other forms of gambling as skilled players may increase their chances of winning significantly. In the case Cohen v. The Queen judge ruled that the gambling activities were not conducted in sufficiently businesslike manner and thus the losses were not deductible.[12]

Gambling tax around the world per

Gambling Tax Around The World Chart


See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^IRC Section 165(d).
  2. ^480 U.S. 23, 32 (1987).
  3. ^Technical Advice Memorandum 200417004.
  4. ^ abT.C. Memo 1987-530.
  5. ^IRC Section 162.
  6. ^Id.
  7. ^Id.
  8. ^Id.
  9. ^T.C. Memo 1994-483.
  10. ^Id.
  11. ^Bonusfinder Canada. 'Do I need to pay taxes on my casino winnings?'. www.bonus.ca. Retrieved 24 February 2020.
  12. ^ abcRotfleisch, David. 'Taxation Of Gambling And Poker Winnings – A Toronto Tax Lawyer Guide'. mondaq.com. Retrieved 24 February 2020.
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Income_tax_on_gambling&oldid=942387440'